A small 3.5mm dongle may work fine in the car for a few hours, but you're out of luck if the battery runs out. You also need to consider where you will use the receiver most frequently. Pricier models may also add digital audio outputs. Most receivers come with at least a pair of RCA audio outputs and often a 3.5mm auxiliary jack or headphone output. For example, using a receiver that only has a pair of RCA analog audio outputs won’t do much good if you’re trying to plug in headphones. The wired connectivity is just as critical. You also need to consider that older models may not support more recent Bluetooth versions, which means they’ll lack features in comparison. For example, on the wireless side, a more basic receiver might only offer the standard SBC Bluetooth codec, while more advanced models might offer the aptX codec as well. Otherwise, it is not the spoon that is bending.The most important factor to consider when buying a Bluetooth audio receiver is the connectivity, both Bluetooth and wired. If you can tell reliably 8 out of 10 times and can document it in a video, I will pay you $350 so you can buy this product. What is that? You hear an improvement? Have a loved one put the isolator in and out of the loop of the USB connection 10 times. And isolating its digital stream from the DAC output. Any half-decent DAC - and I am talking $99 and above - produces great performance by filtering its own USB power. As much as audiophiles are running to them to buy their products, I cannot recommend it for this application. Intona knows what they are doing when it comes to proper, professional USB isolators. Whatever latency the Intona adds must be in microseconds and lost in the noise of latency elsewhere. After some struggle, I managed to get somewhat reliable latency numbers: There is a test that can approximate it but has its own quirks. In addition, the Audio Precision analyzer lacks a simple delay measurement for digital sources. My analyzer sends bits over ASIO interface to USB/DAC and that interface has its own latencies. Oh wait, the owner wanted to know if it added latency to pipeline. The inline nature of the Intona has a light cost in that it saps some USB power resulting in slightly reduced output level in the Modi 2 (from 1.62 volts to 1.56 volts). That impact improves SINAD by just 0.4 dB which is nothing to write home about. We still have the spray of that junk but the floor of them has moved down. Here is what happens when I route the USB cable through Intona: Instead we have some harmonic distortion (to be expected) and a ton of other junk from low to high frequencies. The main tone at 1 kHz is all that we want to see. Here is the Modi 2 directly hooked up to my PC: After much frustration, I pulled out my old and discontinued Schiit Modi 2 USB which I know is sensitive to USB (power) noise and managed to eek out a bit of difference. They continued to work just as well as they did without Intona. None of the high-end DACs cared one way or the other. I literally spent hours trying to find DAC whose performance could be improved with this device. Not that this matters with Audio DACs since they almost all are USB 2.0. And of course much more convenient to use.Īlso, until recently all such isolators were USB 2.0 so having a 3.0 version is quite cool. This is very good because there is no risk of ground loops created (common problem with typical USB audio tweaks with external power). The Intona uses the incoming USB power and regenerates it on the isolated side. Look carefully and you notice that there is no input for power supply.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |